6 research outputs found

    Discriminating Between the Physical Processes that Drive Spheroid Size Evolution

    Get PDF
    Massive galaxies at high-z have smaller effective radii than those today, but similar central densities. Their size growth therefore relates primarily to the evolving abundance of low-density material. Various models have been proposed to explain this evolution, which have different implications for galaxy, star, and BH formation. We compile observations of spheroid properties as a function of redshift and use them to test proposed models. Evolution in progenitor gas-richness with redshift gives rise to initial formation of smaller spheroids at high-z. These systems can then evolve in apparent or physical size via several channels: (1) equal-density 'dry' mergers, (2) later major or minor 'dry' mergers with less-dense galaxies, (3) adiabatic expansion, (4) evolution in stellar populations & mass-to-light-ratio gradients, (5) age-dependent bias in stellar mass estimators, (6) observational fitting/selection effects. If any one of these is tuned to explain observed size evolution, they make distinct predictions for evolution in other galaxy properties. Only model (2) is consistent with observations as a dominant effect. It is the only model which allows for an increase in M_BH/M_bulge with redshift. Still, the amount of merging needed is larger than that observed or predicted. We therefore compare cosmologically motivated simulations, in which all these effects occur, & show they are consistent with all the observational constraints. Effect (2), which builds up an extended low-density envelope, does dominate the evolution, but effects 1,3,4, & 6 each contribute ~20% to the size evolution (a net factor ~2). This naturally also predicts evolution in M_BH-sigma similar to that observed.Comment: 19 pages, 7 figures. accepted to MNRAS (matches accepted version

    Perceptual abstraction and attention

    Get PDF
    This is a report on the preliminary achievements of WP4 of the IM-CleVeR project on abstraction for cumulative learning, in particular directed to: (1) producing algorithms to develop abstraction features under top-down action influence; (2) algorithms for supporting detection of change in motion pictures; (3) developing attention and vergence control on the basis of locally computed rewards; (4) searching abstract representations suitable for the LCAS framework; (5) developing predictors based on information theory to support novelty detection. The report is organized around these 5 tasks that are part of WP4. We provide a synthetic description of the work done for each task by the partners
    corecore